I saw a commercial by Scott Walker today where he said that one program would have cost our state 60,000 jobs and another 40,000 jobs. Did he really mean to say that those new programs that would benefit all of us would have cost the taxpayers the bill to pay for the 60,000 and 40,000 new jobs that would have been created?
In effect is Scott Walker vetoing Wisconsin jobs because they are paid for by the taxpayer and not business? If so, Scott please veto your own and your bid for candidacy for Governor. Scott whether you know it or not all jobs in Wisconsin are paid for by the taxpayer. And the ones you and your party seek to eliminate cost the taxpayer more in the long run. Maybe if you were not a college dropout you would be able to figure out why this is true.
Why do Scott Walker and the Republican Party want to eliminate jobs paid for directly by the taxpayer? Because they cannot effectively manage these jobs and they are not as easily managed and manipulated by the constituency of money that backs the Republican Party. The Republican Party today is the party that would like to create a Wild West out of the United States of America, where few are educated and the blunt logic of six gun rules. Do not wait for this to happen anymore, vote against them now. This country was not founded on the principals of today’s Republican Party and they have greatly weakened us.
Did he really mean to say that programs that provide for cleaner air and water make the State of Wisconsin a healthier place to live and that attracts jobs to the State and that is why he did not approve of the 60,000 and 40,000 jobs that would have been created to address this?
I watched his cross eyes read the teleprompter in this commercial and I am quite sure that he missed a few words that changed the meaning to the exact opposite of what it should have been. You could not pay me to take him or Dick Cheney with me bird hunting.
If he cannot read the meaning on his own teleprompter do we trust him to write the next term of Wisconsin’s future as Governor?
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2010 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment