Police Detective Type Thinking 05 18
2015
Drug Production
Let's say I was a criminal who wanted
to produce drugs in an abandoned warehouse, big box retail store,
factory... that went out of business. How would I go about doing
that? I would board the whole thing up so that no light could escape
from the building at night.
Then I would build a tunnel to the
place from an adjacent property! There would never ever be a single
car in that parking lot! (Chicago, New York and Madison Wisconsin
have tunnel networks!!!!)
Having said that, I don't believe that
any corporate owned property ever has the Constitutional right to be
free from unreasonable search and seizure!!!
Perhaps there should also be a law that
abandoned buildings must have windows cut in their exterior walls so
that law enforcement and the public can make sure that nothing
criminal is going on inside.
Also because there has not been
succession planning in case a business establishment in a large
building when a business fails perhaps after a period of 5 years the
building is to be raised. So the owner doesn't want to pay to have
it done just like he doesn't want to pay to take down the old sign
that is no good anymore? Let those who would salvage everything
their come in and pick it clean! Steel walls, Ibeams and bricks. A
sign out front could read salvageable to the public enter at your own
personal risk?
Once they secure that border I think we
get a lot more problems like this. And it isn't far fetched
considering the miles long tunnels from Mexico to the U.S. (It takes
graduated mining engineers doesn't it!)
*****'
Now what about children in foster care
homes that are abused. And how come there wasn't Government
intervention via a Social Worker?
I have seen and talked to a great
many nurses while visiting hospitals. I don't really believe any
one of them has the competence to make the determination if a child
is being abused in a foster care home or by an adoptive family.
a. Not competent! They have been fed
a standard operating procedure baloney that attempts to structure
their thinking on the issue so that no false decisions are made, and
that weeded out the good people?
b. They are easily duped and gullible
and do not want to lose their job by making a controversial decision
where the satanic parent causes a backlash directed at them!
c. Satanic activity is highly
profitable, so ….and this is the great horror...they are paid off
so that the parent can keep the child and continue to abuse it!
******'
You don't see porn magazines in the gas
stations these days. But I imagine that back in the day a few
decades ago that there might have been child porn on the shelves of
some creep shops? So it had to have been printed. So a printer had
to have been hired. Are you attempting to tell me that that printer
who no longer prints that stuff doesn't know exactly who produced it?
And are you telling me that the ink couldn't be analyzed to
determine where it was purchased? But forget all that! I am not so
naïve to believe that with all the NSA power house to eavesdrop on
Americans that they don't know exactly where the internet child porn
comes from! So what do we do when Government based law enforcement
is negligent to the point of criminal participation? Racketeering
charges and confiscation of personal assets apply!
So how come it never happens?
Does this sound like paranoia? It
isn't because children are abused in foster homes. So what does it
mean when a religion or individual promotes a framework where
children will be abused? It means that person doesn't really
understand cause and effect, the consequences of their
decisions,...etc. Very simply put they don't have that ability. And
it is prophetic thinking. But prophetic thinking is the type of
thinking that any man who has a family should have! For example, I
need to explain the dangers of this to my child so that when they are
confronted with it they will not be in harms way? That rug there in
the entrance to this business is curled up, someone could trip on it.
I know I am not going to trip on it because I saw it. So I will
walk right around it??? What if you weren't the one to see it?
Prophetic thinking is like that! They label it paranoia because they
aren't capable of it. What they are capable of is being a born and
lifetime drunk!
Enter poetic justice! It means because you didn't mind that misfortune happened to someone else it is going to happen to you and their is nothing you can do to stop it. Why? Because you never wanted to develop the mental skill set because you had a mental barrier that prevented you from first person cognition?
The world you didn't mind creating for other people becomes your terminal fate. ~ You made an eternal h3ll for your soul that you can't escape? Like it or not many people are miserable for this exact reason! So somehow they need to be jarred from that mindset! And what is the hallmark of that behavior? A short term reward system!
But how do you tell who has it? Because they enjoy the feeling they get from targeting and insulting people! Thriving on Fury, to borrow back to a recent article.
*****'
You never hear of drug dealers being
shot during a drug bust by police! You hear of homeless being shot,
etc. But you never hear of the Police shooting drug dealers in a
planned drug bust. What bothers me here is I believe a courtesy is
being granted to the drug user because of a shared defect with regard
to cognition by certain members of law enforcement!
Let's say I am a brave cop going
into a drug bust. There are two people in the room with me. Then
three more enter and attempt to circle behind me. I tell them to get
in front of me immediately so that I can see them. When they do not
comply do I as an officer have the right to discharge me weapon and
potentially kill all 5? You already know what I think about drugs
and how the mentally defective are created by them so you know what I
believe!
I don't believe that anyone of “second
person” cognition belongs in law enforcement, government or
managerial professions. Even if you consider humanity to be less
that what it should be today, even that needs to be of a standard
higher than it is in order for all of us to survive.
*****'
The customer service person whose
attitude is one of resentment rather than consideration. Some people
seem to exhibit a complete lack of consideration for other people.
There is no greater indicator of
whether a business will go bankrupt than what I call the lady
standard! It is infallible!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 05 18 2015 at:
www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
